Let’s see what will
happen if a citizen meets an AI-enabled robot instead of a human being (Duty
Officer) when he first appears at the police station. At the very least, he’ll
get a patient hearing, almost immediately, no sitting around waiting
indefinitely, no lunch-ke-baad-aana. Whatever he says will get recorded in the
General Diary verbatim but in a legible manner. If the matter is merely
informatory in nature, a receipt with General Diary number, date and time will
be automatically generated for him. If the matter indicates a cognizable
offence, an FIR will be drawn up in a legible manner with correct sections of
law without any discretion and escalated to the SHO for taking a decision as to
whether to investigate or refuse investigation and allotment to an
Investigating Officer. Refusal to register complaints, the long-standing bane
of the police, will now be a thing of the past. This one measure, in itself,
will transform the functioning and image of police no end.
Further, AI can reduce
the humungous documentation burden that police stations grapple with. In 2024, around
59 lakh cognizable cases were registered. Each such case involves a
First Information Report, the spot maps, witness statements, arrest memos,
forensic reports, seizure lists, medical examination records, report in final
form, and so on – documents numbering in hundreds. All documents in local
language need to be translated in English when a case goes to the High Court or
the Supreme Court. Manual translations for a single case can take up to 15 days
which can now be done in an hour or so, while retaining specialised legal/
local terminology like surathal, panchnama, khatian, zimma etc. and also
retaining page-for-page parity so that it is acceptable in the court. AI enabled
digitisation can read handwritten FIRs in multiple languages with high
accuracy. It can also process low-quality scans and faded documents by
intelligently reconstructing the degraded letters. Most importantly, all the
documents will become searchable.
Another big help from AI would be when the investigation is
transferred to another officer due to transfer, etc.. Rather than the new
officer having to go through the entire case file word by word, he can go
through a structured summary, a chronological timeline of events, evidentiary
gaps and inconsistencies, all generated by AI. AI can listen in to
interrogation of accused, correlate everything and point out the
inconsistencies in the statements.
AI can also generate the chargesheet index, cross-reference
evidences and biometric data, witnesses and the sections of law and check for
completeness of the case diary and the chargesheet. It can also create a draft
prosecution narrative to be used by the Public Prosecutor and the Investigating
Officer. My back-of-the-envelope calculation indicates that AI can free up to
around 30 officer-hours per day at a mid-size police station on documentation
alone.
Both at the police station level and beyond, AI can also
help in mapping crime hotspots, connect FIRs and Modus Operandi and help in
identifying repeat offenders.
Police station inspections by senior officers are the
backbone of police administration. Usually, it’s an annual affair preceding
which there is a lot of activity to compile statistics and cover-ups so that
the inspection goes off peacefully. Then things are forgotten for a year until
the next inspection which may be by a different officer or the same officer who
may not remember much of what all he’d instructed the previous time around.
When one goes through successive inspection remarks, one sometimes sees the
same instructions having been passed from time immemorial, without any
substantive changes in the performance. AI can enable a GPS-enabled field visit
tracking system which will have a digital record of every inspection. This will
enable continuous performance monitoring and accountability rather than having
a lot of sound and fury once in a year, signifying nothing. During every
inspection, all previous instructions and their compliances would be available
to the inspecting officer so that repeat issues will be highlighted. GPS
tracking will ensure that the supervising officer actually visits the police
station rather than churning out reports sitting in his office.
A module can be carved out for the public representatives
to send their recommendation and escalate to higher-ups, if need be. Further,
there can be a chat bot for the public to obtain any information regarding
their application for permission, licences, various fines, applicable sections
of law, etc. in any Indian language and English.
Finally, the performance of officers will now face
automatic and systematic evaluation based on objective parameters like average
response time, detection, preventive action, tasks performed, compliance
metrics, pending cases, escalation frequency, etc. so that high performers can
be rewarded and encouraged suitably while underperformers will be caught out
and earmarked for skill and performance augmentation.
Despite all the foregoing, it is important that there must
be human oversight and intervention because AI makes mistakes and sometimes,
the mistakes in policing can make the difference between life and death,
literally. Even if the Duty Officer may become dispensable, there must be some
supervision of the robot doing that job too. Because many things about policing
are confidential, the AI systems must be based on a dedicated self-hosted Large Language
model, end-to-end encrypted and with restricted access to certain parts and
trained on all the criminal laws, police regulations, Government Orders, SOPs
and circulars.
There should be a unified gateway for all officers. Any FIR
should be possible to be generated at any police station with automatic
transfers to the police station of jurisdiction. The heinous crime cases (SR
cases) which are supervised by senior officers can have almost instantaneous
passing of instructions with deadlines and automatic escalation in case of
non-compliance.
While predictive AI hasn’t been much of a success, it can
still be used for “now-casting” – i.e., predicting the present or very near
future crimes, riots and traffic issues using real-time data. AI can’t judge
context or the nuances of social situations and does not have the emotional
intelligence required of an SHO. As of today, AI can’t become an SHO but use of
AI can make for an unimaginably better SHO. By several orders of magnitude.

Brilliant concept and exposition of the AI potential in the core areas of registration and investigation of information and offences.
ReplyDeleteCongratulations, Bhibhutiji!
Thank you, Sir π. I feel Police is lagging behind other departments and the corporate sector in adopting AI for improvement in its functioning. The faster they do so, the better they'd be able to serve.
DeleteGreat unexplored potential of AI
ReplyDeleteπ
DeleteWonderful Sir. Hope to see iit in reality in the true spirit
ReplyDeleteπ
DeleteHopefully the future of policing that may not come in our lifetime…IK Gautam
ReplyDeleteI'm optimistic. Some adoption has already started but mainly for negative purposes - like Delhi Police's face recognition AI during the recent CJP protest. The cops can actually harness AI for a lot of good. Or, so I think.
DeleteSir,
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for sharing this wonderful piece. It was truly insightful to read your vision of how AI can transform policing, from ensuring every citizen is heard without delay, to easing the burden of documentation, to bringing greater accountability into the system. Your balanced perspective, especially on the continued need for human oversight, made it even more thought-provoking. With Regards, Souradeep
Thank you. I am quite sure you and others in active service will use AI for doing a lot of good work.
ReplyDelete