In my childhood, I had heard a popular rhyme, “Machha khaiba ilisi, chakiri kariba polici,” meaning, “out of all the fish in the world, the choicest is Hilsa fish; out of all the jobs in the world, the best one is that of a cop.” In the India of the early 1960s characterized by low incomes, job attractiveness tended to be measured by the potential for illegal gratifications. The incomes have gone way up, even in real terms. India is no longer the land defined only by snake charmers, rope tricks and abject poverty. However, Police continues to be associated with rampant corruption.
At the police station, registering a case,
investigation, decision to arrest, submitting of chargesheet, closing the case;
each stage of the game is marked by what is euphemistically referred to as
“give-and-take.” I once got hold of a “(top) secret” register of a police station
under my jurisdiction. The double entries of income and outflows were so perfect that I thought even
my accounts teacher at IIMB could have learnt a thing or two. All collections
were written on the left-hand side and all outflows including balance were
given diligently on the right-hand side. It was also actually “audited by an
internal Committee!” To my horror, I saw my own name and designation on the
outflow column each month so I confronted the SHO (he is called OC in my cadre).
He explained that the rate was fixed by one of my predecessors and it continues
until a different rate is fixed by another officer. Since unfortunately
(unfortunately?) I wasn’t taking the money, that share used to go into an
escrow account to be spent informally for certain specified purposes.
Similarly, the rates were fixed for each rank. Interesting part was, a person
was entitled to his share of the monthly pie only if he was on duty for at
least one day in the calendar month. That is when I understood why all Earned
Leave applications were of 27/ 28 days and never subsumed an entire month. If
anyone was unfortunate enough to forfeit his share like this, that again went
into the escrow account. Every police station also annually appointed someone
as a “dak master”, through auction, to fulfil the collection target. Anything
beyond that was his profit.
The dak master “supervises” the various organs of “collection.” The constabulary extorts money from the hawkers, footpath dwellers, truck and bus drivers and so on. This is the visible corruption but actually accounts for a miniscule portion of the take. The investigating officers concentrate on the complainants, witnesses and the accused. The SHO acts as the “gatekeeper” for registering of criminal cases and arrests. There is of course the “hafta,” weekly collections from shopkeepers, businesses and criminal operators. And so on. I found that there was a lot of demand for “night patrolling.” Usually, every Police Station has one jeep dedicated to it. This jeep is affectionately called “Laxmi Bhandar” by the Police Station staff. Interestingly, the night patrolling often doesn’t end with the night and continues to daylight hours, including and up to the afternoons.
As Additional SP, on the day of assuming
my second charge, I was sitting in my office, feeling sleepy and waiting for
some file to come or the telephone to ring. The first call was from the-person-who-must-not-be-named
but who was rumoured to be actually running everything! No, not the CM or the
Chief Secretary but someone whose ante chamber used to be replete with Chief
Secretary/ DGP aspirants and history’s unmarked graves of discarded careers. I
was jolted out of my stupor and sat bolt upright. Nearly saluted invisibly.
Here is the conversation:
“You’ve joined. Good, good.”
Me: “(Sputter,
sputter)”
“Your officer visited someone I
know regarding Police verification for a government job. He has made such a
huge demand that this person is not able to pay. Please see if something can be
done.”
Me: “Please tell him
not to entertain any such demand. I’ll check.”
“No, no. Whatever normal
expectation would be fulfilled. I’m just requesting because the demand is way
higher than normal.”
A threshold of corruption seemed
the accepted norm.
Same office. Another day. A Deputy
Magistrate visited me and told me that his sister had got admission in a
prestigious medical institute in London but was not able to go because one of
my officials was harassing her for money for giving the Police clearance for
her passport and the amount was beyond their capabilities. When I started the
enquiry, the girl’s father pleaded with me not to proceed because that might
antagonize the official even further and, as a result, his daughter would not
be able to go. I reassured him, arranged for all the clearances, placed the
official under suspension and initiated a Departmental Enquiry. These enquiries
proceed at their own pace. Three years and two further postings of mine later,
the Enquiry Officer and the charged official landed up in my office to formally
record my statement in the enquiry. After the formal process was over, I asked
the official where he was posted those days. He smugly replied, “You see, Sir,
you suspended me about three years back. After that, I’ve never bothered to
return to office.” Apparently, he had already earned so much illegally that he
found managing his money and attending to his myriad private businesses more profitable. He was only interested
in completion of the enquiry so that he could resign and his pension would be
forthcoming.
[to be
concluded]
Hi Dash,
ReplyDeleteJust got round to reading your latest post. Your narrating style of tongue in cheek humour ( sarcasm ?!) around hard hitting personal experiences makes your posts highly readable.
Institutionalised corruption is not unique to police. I have personally seen ( been involved?) the well oiled, and if I may add, highly efficient corruption machinery at work within the defence services. But that is another tale.......
Keep writing my friend. Boond boond se samundar banta hai. I remain sure green shoots like your narratives would shift the situation for the better over time. πππππ
During my MPM at NUS/Harvard (2009), I reflected long and hard as to why Singapore and India, starting at the same level, developed so divergently. Singapore with indifferent manpower and no resources went on from a third world country to a super-first world country within one and a half generations. Whereas, India with a huge and diverse resource base and a large elite comparable to the best in the world, struggles. Although India has achieved much in many fields, there are serious lacunae in some basic provisioning and apathetic hopelessness in many areas. All the excuses like Singapore being a small country, etc. don't wash. IMHO, the one thing that accounts for much of the divergence is the sincere intolerance towards corruption in Singapore and its historical and enduring pervasiveness in India.
DeleteLiving in Singapore for over 10 years now, I have had to interact with various government departments. Attitude has always been to serve and resolve the issue. In this same period, almost every thing can be done on-line, no paperwork and instant outcome. To top it all, after using any service, you promptly receive a feedback request. Once, I placed a comment, and I received a call next day seeking clarification. And of course, even a taxi driver doesn’t expect a tip.
ReplyDelete