There is a lot of debate in the social media, often polarized, as to how good or bad the Prime Minister or a Chief Minister or particular politician or political party is. All this is under the notion that politicians run the country. However, the Yes Minister and Yes Prime Minister series had a different take on it regarding the Westminster system that we inherited/adopted. In those classics, Sir Humphrey, the great philosopher cleverly disguised as a civil servant opined that periodic elections were just a minor inconvenience to decide which bunch would try (unsuccessfully) to interfere with the business of government actually carried out by the bureaucrats. He also felt all government policies were nonsense, but frightfully well carried out.
His Prime Minister had an even more scathing opinion
about the opinion makers, i.e., the newspaper readers:
“I know exactly who reads the papers. The Daily Mirror is read by people who think they run the country; The Guardian is read by people who think they ought to run the country; The Times is read by the people who actually do run the country; The Daily Mail is read by the wives of the people who run the country; The Financial Times is read by people who own the country; The Morning Star is read by people who think the country ought to be run by another country; and The Daily Telegraph is read by people who think it is. Sun readers don't care who runs the country as long as (the rest deleted).”
Replace the newspapers with the raucous TV channels and the description can well fit today’s scenario.
If Sir Humphrey was right, it’s amazing to see that our country has actually been run by an IPS officer for much of its post-Independence history.
I don’t think many people outside Police circles
would’ve heard of a person called B.N. Mullik. Yet, a foreign head of state
visiting India at the time had remarked, “The two most powerful men in India
are Nehru and B.N. Mullik ... not necessarily in that order.” He was an I.P.
officer (I.P., first called Indian Imperial Police and later, Imperial Police) who
ruled the roost from 1950 to 1964 as Director of Intelligence Bureau. While
there may be debates about the rights and wrongs of what he did and didn’t do,
there is no gainsaying the fact that almost all major events of India during
that period, political and non-political, were referred to him for substantive
decision-making inputs. Like all powerful civil servants, he maintained an
extremely low profile and, unlike them, disappeared into the Himalayas after his retirement.
He was occasionally sighted in his later life as Kinkar Vishwananda pursuing a
spiritual path. Review of a book on him was being published in the Illustrated
Weekly of India. Try as he might, the editor, Khushwant Singh couldn’t lay his
hands on a suitable photograph of his so he collected a photo of a young B.N.
Mullik and asked his photographer to age the photograph about 30 years so that
it could be published along with the review.
A post of National Security Advisor (NSA) was created in 1998 by the government headed by Atal Bihari Vajpayee. Brajesh Mishra was the first incumbent. He used to boast to even very senior Ministers, “You can tell and persuade the PM about anything for any amount of time, I just have to whisper in his ears just before he goes into the critical meeting for the same and carry the day.” That was no empty boast.
In the UPA era, this very (actually, most) powerful
post was split into two. The foreign aspects were handled by former Foreign
Secretary, Mr. J.N. Dixit and the internal aspects were handled by Mr. M.K. Narayanan, a retired IPS officer. After the demise of the former in
2005, the offices were again merged and Mr. Narayanan became the single
NSA. With great responsibility came great power and he was the real power for a
long five years, until 2010. The Indo-US civil nuclear cooperation agreement was only one of the big-ticket events which carried his substantive footprints.
Since 2014, Mr. Ajit Doval, former Director, IB and
superannuated from the IPS has been the NSA. Many of the spectacular actions in
recent years, surgical strike, cross-border Balakot airstrike, the Doklam
standoff resolution, etc. have been attributed to him. True to his
self-effacing ethos, Mr. Doval hasn’t said a word about them. However, a few things have
been visible to all through the electronic media. In the thick of the Delhi riots, his visit to the affected
areas rapidly cooled down the panic and the tensions. It was widely reported
that his intervention brought the serious faultlines around a COVID-19
superspreader problem to a resolution. In Pakistani channels, there are very
loud and heated arguments by the panelists regarding many India-centric things
but, invariably, all panelists agree on one thing. If there is one person whose
professional capabilities the Pakistani establishment is scared of, it’s Mr.
Doval and they don’t have anyone to match him. He has been at the helm for
eight years now, and counting.
So, at least 27 years out of a post-Independence
history of 75 years. Not bad for a service which is only one out of 30-odd Group A civil
services of India!
Not bad at all...
ReplyDelete🙏
DeleteThat's gr8 sir
ReplyDelete🙏
DeleteAn eye opener 🤗
ReplyDelete🙏
DeleteI used to like the Blitz..not sure what that makes me.. a nobody, perhaps.
ReplyDeleteThe Blitz, or rather, its sister publication The Daily had an arrangement with UK's The Daily Mirror and the Blitz headlines sometimes resembled those of Sun so you'd be a cross between people who think they run the country and people who don't care who runs the country as long as she has ...
Delete