Now that there seems a sliver of a chance to reclaim our democracy, here’s my wish list to build it back better.
1. The
sine qua non for democracy is a free and fair election which gives a
level-playing field to all contestants so it has to start with the Election
Commission of India (ECI). The latest Act for the appointment of the election
commissioners should be scrapped. The earlier Supreme Court (SC) mandated selection
structure with Chief Justice of the Supreme Court as member should not only be
brought back but should be designated as part of the “basic structure of the
Constitution.” The Chief Election Commissioner should enjoy the status and
privileges of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
2. The
election should be believable by the opposition. Towards that end, the EVM
related issues must be sorted out. VVPATs should be machine-read for all the
polling stations and tallied with the EVM results.
3. Election
expenditure limits for the candidates are ridiculous at present. They should be
fixed at a more reasonable level. On the other hand, there is no limit on the
expenditure of the political party on elections. These limits should also be
prescribed on a per candidate basis.
4. All
fundings for parties and elections including corporate funding should be
completely transparent. The donor, the receiver and the actual beneficial ownership of the donation should be published on the ECI website.
5. Total
number of votes polled should be published on the ECI website within 48 hours
of the scheduled close of polling hours of each phase. ECI should aim to hold the polls
for each state on one single date to begin with, and for the entire country
eventually.
6. Democracy
doesn’t merely consist of polls once in five years. It needs to be nurtured and
health-checked every single day. Towards this, strength of the institutions and
conventions are critical. Let’s start with the Parliament. We should borrow
some of the good (great!) things of the Westminster conventions – Weekly Prime
Minister’s Question hour with minimum six questions granted to the leader of
the opposition, Ministerial code whereby lying in the Parliament means sacking),
Conscience voting, announcement of major policy first on the floor of the House
when in session and, ideally, shadow ministers by the opposition party/ coalition.
7. To
avoid railroading of the minorities and the marginalised, it is necessary that
these sections have an effective representation and say in the Parliament.
There are many ways of ensuring it.
8. Once
a person is elected as a speaker, (s)he should cease to have any party
affiliation or to cast vote in the case of a tie. There should be no party whip
for election of speaker – it should be a ‘conscience vote.’ Ideally, the
speaker should be a retired justice of the Supreme Court without any political
affiliation and after a two-year cooling-off period after retirement. Parliament
is a forum of accountability and belongs to the opposition – the opposition
should get 2/3rd of the discussion time. No bill should be passed by
voice vote.
9. The
single largest opposition party, regardless of its numbers, should nominate the leader of
the opposition.
10. Every
member of Parliament must attend at least 50 % of each session failing which (s)he
must forfeit her/his membership.
11. All
far-reaching legislations must go through deliberations of the Parliamentary
committees. The remit of the Parliamentary Committees should be specific and
defined.
12. Now,
let us come to the executive. No one should be Prime Minister for more than
five years, overall, whether it’s a full term or a combination of truncated
terms. Only a member of Lok Sabha should be able to become a Minister or Prime
Minister – that will accord legitimacy to these offices. There should be
deliberative, consultative process of decision-taking. At the minimum, all
major decisions should be by the cabinet. Anything with far-reaching
consequences must be widely examined through parliamentary committees and
inviting comments from the public. Decision making will be a little slower in
the process but it will avoid disasters like demonetisation, sudden lockdown,
the now-repealed farm laws and so on.
13. In the United Kingdom, the Civil Service enjoys serious credibility. That is because they are able to function without fear or favour. For example, when the opposition was sniping away at Boris Johnson, he appointed a civil servant, Sue Gray to enquire and everybody went quiet until the Sue Gray report. The civil servants there have recourse to a grievance redressal mechanism which ensures against unlawful transfer or termination. In India, we do not have that. We should aim for a system where the civil service should act as the first bulwark against authoritarian whimsicality. The Police needs to be independent of the political executive. Already, there is a Supreme Court order to achieve this but the politicians have found creative ways to subvert it so far. This refers to my blog:
https://b-b-dash.blogspot.com/2023/01/the-caged-parrot.html
14. The
appointment of the higher executive makes a difference towards the independence
and integrity of the civil services. The former system of Appointments
Committee of the Cabinet should be restored – currently, it is just a PMO
letter box. [Earlier, all appointments of Joint Secretary and above were with
the approval of the Cabinet Secretary, the concerned Minister, two seniormost
Ministers and the Prime Minister.]
15. Chief
of Army Staff, Judges, Police, Comptroller & Auditor General, UPSC members
and so on should be completely outside political appointment/ manipulation.
16. The
offices of Governors have come under a cloud many times, under many
governments. Qualification for Governors should be prescribed. Governors should
be from a panel which should be arrived at through the deliberations of a
broad-based Committee. Knowledge of law should be an essential pre-requisite
for the post. Once a Governor is appointed, he should continue for five years
and his term should not be co-terminus with that of the Central government.
17. The
final custodians of democracy are the Courts. Judicial appointments should be
ring-fenced against political overreach. The deliberations of the collegium
should be made open and mandatory in a time-bound manner. Delay in judicial determinations
is misused to hound officials and political rivals. So much so that the process
becomes the punishment. Adjournment of hearing should be the rare exception
rather than the norm as of now. I also find that when the witnesses land up,
sometimes travelling great distances, the hearing is adjourned just because the
concerned judge happens to be on leave on that day. Hearing, recording of
evidence, etc. should be carried out by whichever judge is standing in for the
day. Then, there is the matter of long vacations of the Courts. Vacation
benches/ judges rarely pronounce substantive orders. It has been seen that
sometimes executive actions, legislative skullduggery and even ordinances are
timed to coincide with these vacations. These should be judicially dealt with
with a heavy hand and promptly.
18. The
media, both national and regional, are in a bad shape. That is because the
media houses are critically dependent on governments for advertisements,
newsprint, etc. and also there have been unsavoury prosecutions and arrests.
India must develop a system of penalty for wrongful arrest, to be recovered
from the person effecting the arrest. There are many advertisements and
packaging which are ostensibly by the government but, in reality, for promoting
particular political leaders. All these must stop. Photographs of political
leaders in offices should also be banned. Media should have a possibility of
crowdfunding by putting a ceiling on such donations but making the donations
tax-exempt.
19. India has enough ability and resources to thrive on its own. What is required is stability and predictability rather than the governments interfering in too many things and actually encouraging regulatory capture. So, the golden principle should be, “If it ain't broke, don't fix it.”
Can we as ordinary citizens do anything
regarding the above? Well, just one YouTuber with courage of conviction and at
great risk to himself made a substantial difference in the last election ...
No comments:
Post a Comment